France may be the world’s most nuclear energy dependent country, but times are changing. When French President François Hollande took the reins of power in 2012 he pledged to reduce the country’s nuclear dependency from 75% to 50% by 2025.

Today, France has a goal of reaching 19 GW of wind energy by 2020, up from its current level of 8.2 GW, according to the European Wind Energy Association’s (EWEA) latest statistics. This will significantly raise the percentage of wind powered electricity in the country from the 3% wind covers today. And, according to a very recent survey, the French are behind this transition.

Some 64% of French people see wind energy as a solution, among others, in the context of the energy transition, says a CSA survey published in March 2014. Moreover, 80% of the 1010 respondents consider it necessary to invest in wind without waiting for the traditional power plants to reach the end of their lifecycle.

65% of those surveyed said that they would invest in renewable energy (wind and solar/photovoltaic) today if they had to personally invest in one energy source, while 15% chose nuclear, 7% chose gas and 1% chose coal. Meanwhile, 69% of French people would choose wind energy if they had to choose one energy type to be constructed in their region. 75% chose solar, 21% chose nuclear, 16% chose gas and 4% chose gas.

In short, the results show that the French are aware that an energy transition must take place, they are confident enough in renewables to invest if they could, and they know that the time to act is now. Next year is a key year for energy decision-makers in France since both the UN summit on climate change will take place in Paris, and, just two weeks before, EWEA will host is internationally-renowned annual event EWEA 2015 from 17-20 November in the same city. The event is set to be a platform for the wind energy industry to make its climate-friendly technology solutions known to global leaders at the UN summit.

France’s opinions on wind power sit well with Europe-wide opinion polls on wind energy, as detailed by EWEA. EWEA believes that wind energy delivers a multitude of benefits to communities from sustainable jobs and economic revival, to fighting climate change and bolstering energy security. On a local level, renting out land for wind farms can provide income, and taxes from a wind energy business can be used by the local community to improve infrastructure and services – all of which contribute to the public’s strong perception of wind power.

The results in France echo other public opinion surveys in the country: In 2011 an ADEME opinion poll found that 80% of French people back the installation of wind turbines. In 2013 an IPSOS survey found that wind power had a good image for 83% of the population. The same survey found that 80% of interviewees would welcome wind turbines in their region (départment) while 68% would welcome turbines in their local area (commune). And, according to France Energie Eolienne, public opinion becomes more favourable the closer the respondent lives to a wind farm.

Switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy and energy efficiency measures in the coming decades is the International Panel for Climate Change’s (IPCC) recommendation in its latest report.

This change is “affordable”, says the IPCC: it would knock only 0.06% off expected annual economic growth rates of 1.3%-3%, without quantifying the enormous health benefits of the lower CO2 and pollution levels.

The report – the third in a trilogy from the IPCC in recent months – was widely picked up in the press.

Some led on the need to “revolutionise the economy” (German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and French daily Le Monde)

Others led with a more alarmist take on the current situation – “Global emissions of greenhouse gases have increased to unprecedented levels despite global efforts to reduce them” said Spanish paper El Mundo – and the limited time left to act (“Only 17 years” said La Repubblica in Italy).

In the UK, there was a divergence of views, with Independent and the Guardian upbeat and focusing on renewables’ role – “Incentives to mitigate climate change are not in vain”, said the former – while the right-wind Times and Telegraph both led on fracking and shale gas “being part of the solution to global warming”.

In fact, the IPCC report only mentions gas and shale gas as an interim measure to replace coal, while stressing that long term, all fossil fuels should be abandoned.

Interestingly this morning, the Financial Times published an article on a poll in the UK showing that three times as many Britons would prefer to live close to a wind farm than to a fracking site, making the government’s plan to stop new onshore wind farm projects look even more illogical.

EWEA’s 2015 Annual Event will be held two weeks prior to the UN’s climate negotiations in Paris in November next year: more information.

The debate about wind turbines and property prices blows on, pushed back into the headlines every so often by a gust from a new study or piece of research.

The latest studies on the subject, from the UK, contradict each other: a study from the London School of Economics purports to show that wind farms can knock as much as 12% off the values of homes within a 2km radius, but a report by the British Centre for Economics and Business Research in March found no negative impact on property prices within a 5km radius of a turbine.

Another UK based study, from the RICS4-Oxford Brookes University in 2007 concluded that “there was limited evidence of detrimental impact of wind farms on house prices”.

Beyond the UK, studies from Denmark, the US and Canada have all corroborate the fact in recent years that there is no impact on property prices.

How is it possible that the highly reputed LSE has come out with a study which shows the opposite of the main research on the subject? Maf Smith, deputy chief executive at UK renewable energy association RenewableUK explained in The Guardian:

“The LSE study tests for the influence of wind farms in a different way. It covers a shorter period rather than looking at the whole lifecycle of the project. It measures only from a central point at each wind farm site rather than taking into account every single turbine at the very edges of the development. It makes necessarily simple assumptions about visibility, when we know that in reality many sites will be hidden by nearby buildings, trees and the local landscape.

“We’re grateful that the professor states that his work is not conclusive. It helps to explain why his findings don’t accord with previous research that the CEBR, RICS and others have done.”