<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electricity from Australian wind farms is cheaper than new coal and new gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ewea.org/blog/2013/02/electricity-from-australian-wind-farms-is-cheaper-than-new-coal-and-new-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2013/02/electricity-from-australian-wind-farms-is-cheaper-than-new-coal-and-new-gas/</link>
	<description>Breath of fresh air</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2013/02/electricity-from-australian-wind-farms-is-cheaper-than-new-coal-and-new-gas/#comment-37248</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ewea.org/blog/?p=4447#comment-37248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[61 Euro per MW-hr !!
This IS good news !   I have just been asked for half that for 180 kW-hr by the new &quot;e-on&quot; - e-prom, or something, in Bulgaria.  Hence the protests in Sophiya, and Varna, that I failed to understand at the time.
    The reality is, that these people who say that they can supply 1MW-hr for 61 - or even 601 Euro are so completely dissconnected from physical reality, that they - probably- don&#039;t even realize that they are the most gifted liars on this holy Earth.    One of them once tried to tell me that one of his (Matt. Partridge) &quot;Turbines&quot; paid for itself in 3 months.   
     Question.   So why is oil still being prospected ?  Why bother with any other investment ?  300% p.a. ! Wait till Wall street hear of it !
(they&#039;re a little slow, it seems)
       Bigger = more expensive per watt for the Turbine.  Less cost per watt for the Alternator.   The total cost  T+A can be seen to be minimum when size is such that the cost of these two components is about equal.     This happens - in my 25yr experience - at around .5 to 1m diameter.     Here it is possible to obtain, from a correct design, 5 - to maybe 15% of cost per annum.   The cost of the new sensible &quot;farm&quot; being about 1/40 that of current &quot;technology&quot;.
Wind is distributed, not centralized.   Many (sensible) &quot;TADs&quot; could  attatch to existing pylons thereby saving hugely on feed-cabling.
Then there is &quot;Offshore&quot;.   But has anyone seen sails re-appearing on ships ? No.  The technology seems out of their money-grubbing little reach.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>61 Euro per MW-hr !!<br />
This IS good news !   I have just been asked for half that for 180 kW-hr by the new &#8220;e-on&#8221; &#8211; e-prom, or something, in Bulgaria.  Hence the protests in Sophiya, and Varna, that I failed to understand at the time.<br />
    The reality is, that these people who say that they can supply 1MW-hr for 61 &#8211; or even 601 Euro are so completely dissconnected from physical reality, that they &#8211; probably- don&#8217;t even realize that they are the most gifted liars on this holy Earth.    One of them once tried to tell me that one of his (Matt. Partridge) &#8220;Turbines&#8221; paid for itself in 3 months.<br />
     Question.   So why is oil still being prospected ?  Why bother with any other investment ?  300% p.a. ! Wait till Wall street hear of it !<br />
(they&#8217;re a little slow, it seems)<br />
       Bigger = more expensive per watt for the Turbine.  Less cost per watt for the Alternator.   The total cost  T+A can be seen to be minimum when size is such that the cost of these two components is about equal.     This happens &#8211; in my 25yr experience &#8211; at around .5 to 1m diameter.     Here it is possible to obtain, from a correct design, 5 &#8211; to maybe 15% of cost per annum.   The cost of the new sensible &#8220;farm&#8221; being about 1/40 that of current &#8220;technology&#8221;.<br />
Wind is distributed, not centralized.   Many (sensible) &#8220;TADs&#8221; could  attatch to existing pylons thereby saving hugely on feed-cabling.<br />
Then there is &#8220;Offshore&#8221;.   But has anyone seen sails re-appearing on ships ? No.  The technology seems out of their money-grubbing little reach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technological advances are improving wind power&#8217;s competitiveness</title>
		<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2013/02/electricity-from-australian-wind-farms-is-cheaper-than-new-coal-and-new-gas/#comment-37088</link>
		<dc:creator>European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technological advances are improving wind power&#8217;s competitiveness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ewea.org/blog/?p=4447#comment-37088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] stated that wind is now cheaper than fossil fuels in producing electricity in Australia, a story reported on this blog at the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stated that wind is now cheaper than fossil fuels in producing electricity in Australia, a story reported on this blog at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belgium: Technological Advances Improving Wind Power’s Competitiveness, EWEA Says &#124; ROV Pilot Technician</title>
		<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2013/02/electricity-from-australian-wind-farms-is-cheaper-than-new-coal-and-new-gas/#comment-35764</link>
		<dc:creator>Belgium: Technological Advances Improving Wind Power’s Competitiveness, EWEA Says &#124; ROV Pilot Technician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ewea.org/blog/?p=4447#comment-35764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] February stated that wind is now cheaper than fossil fuels in producing electricity in Australia, a story reported on EWEA’s blog at the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February stated that wind is now cheaper than fossil fuels in producing electricity in Australia, a story reported on EWEA’s blog at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.A.Jagadeesh</title>
		<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2013/02/electricity-from-australian-wind-farms-is-cheaper-than-new-coal-and-new-gas/#comment-34888</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.A.Jagadeesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 06:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ewea.org/blog/?p=4447#comment-34888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Wind Power, Wind velocity is having cubic relationship. In a place where there is 4 m/s annual wind speed other factors remain the same power is : 4x4x4 = 64. If the Wind velocity is 5 m/s, Power is  5x5x5=125 almost double. So in most windy areas,Wind power can compete with Conventional power anywhere and need not be in Australia.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Wind Power, Wind velocity is having cubic relationship. In a place where there is 4 m/s annual wind speed other factors remain the same power is : 4x4x4 = 64. If the Wind velocity is 5 m/s, Power is  5x5x5=125 almost double. So in most windy areas,Wind power can compete with Conventional power anywhere and need not be in Australia.<br />
Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India<br />
Wind Energy Expert<br />
E-mail: <a href="mailto:anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com">anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.A.Jagadeesh</title>
		<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2013/02/electricity-from-australian-wind-farms-is-cheaper-than-new-coal-and-new-gas/#comment-34887</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.A.Jagadeesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 06:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ewea.org/blog/?p=4447#comment-34887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Wind Power ,Wind velocity is having cubic relationship. In a place where there is 4 m/s annual wind speed other factors remain the same power is : 4x4x4 = 64. If the Wind velocity is 5 m/s, POower is  5x5x5=155 almost doiuble. So in most windy areas,Wind power can compete with Conventional power anywhere and need not be in Australia.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Wind Power ,Wind velocity is having cubic relationship. In a place where there is 4 m/s annual wind speed other factors remain the same power is : 4x4x4 = 64. If the Wind velocity is 5 m/s, POower is  5x5x5=155 almost doiuble. So in most windy areas,Wind power can compete with Conventional power anywhere and need not be in Australia.<br />
Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India<br />
Wind Energy Expert<br />
E-mail: <a href="mailto:anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com">anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.272 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 08:05:27 -->