Electricity from Australian wind farms is cheaper than new coal and new gas
The Australian wind farm sector got a boost of confidence from a Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) analysis that showed electricity produced by the emissions-free generating technology is 14% cheaper than a new coal plant and 18% cheaper than a new gas plant.
“The perception that fossil fuels are cheap and renewables are expensive is now out of date,” Michael Liebreich, chief executive of BNEF, said in a press release. “The fact that wind power is now cheaper than coal and gas in a country with some of the world’s best fossil fuel resources shows that clean energy is a game changer which promises to turn the economics of power systems on its head.”
The BNEF analysis showed electricity can be supplied from a new Australian wind farm for €61/MWh compared to €109/MWh from a new coal plant or €89/MWh from a new gas plant.
The BNEF research showed that since 2011, the cost of wind generation has fallen by 10% while the cost of energy from new fossil-fuelled plants is high and rising.
“New coal is made expensive by high financing costs. The study surveyed Australia’s four largest banks and found that lenders are unlikely to finance new coal without a substantial risk premium due to the reputational damage of emissions-intensive investments – if they are to finance coal at all,” the press release said.
“New gas-fired generation is expensive as the massive expansion of Australia’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) export market forces local prices upwards.”
Kobad Bhavnagri, head of clean energy research for BNEF in Australia, said it is very unlikely that new coal-fired power stations will be built in the nation.
“They are just too expensive now, compared to renewables,” Bhavnagri was quoted as saying. “Even baseload gas may struggle to compete with renewables. Australia is unlikely to require new baseload capacity until after 2020, and by this time wind and large-scale PV should be significantly cheaper than burning expensive, export-priced gas.”






In the Wind Power ,Wind velocity is having cubic relationship. In a place where there is 4 m/s annual wind speed other factors remain the same power is : 4x4x4 = 64. If the Wind velocity is 5 m/s, POower is 5x5x5=155 almost doiuble. So in most windy areas,Wind power can compete with Conventional power anywhere and need not be in Australia.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
In the Wind Power, Wind velocity is having cubic relationship. In a place where there is 4 m/s annual wind speed other factors remain the same power is : 4x4x4 = 64. If the Wind velocity is 5 m/s, Power is 5x5x5=125 almost double. So in most windy areas,Wind power can compete with Conventional power anywhere and need not be in Australia.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
[...] February stated that wind is now cheaper than fossil fuels in producing electricity in Australia, a story reported on EWEA’s blog at the [...]
[...] stated that wind is now cheaper than fossil fuels in producing electricity in Australia, a story reported on this blog at the [...]
61 Euro per MW-hr !!
This IS good news ! I have just been asked for half that for 180 kW-hr by the new “e-on” – e-prom, or something, in Bulgaria. Hence the protests in Sophiya, and Varna, that I failed to understand at the time.
The reality is, that these people who say that they can supply 1MW-hr for 61 – or even 601 Euro are so completely dissconnected from physical reality, that they – probably- don’t even realize that they are the most gifted liars on this holy Earth. One of them once tried to tell me that one of his (Matt. Partridge) “Turbines” paid for itself in 3 months.
Question. So why is oil still being prospected ? Why bother with any other investment ? 300% p.a. ! Wait till Wall street hear of it !
(they’re a little slow, it seems)
Bigger = more expensive per watt for the Turbine. Less cost per watt for the Alternator. The total cost T+A can be seen to be minimum when size is such that the cost of these two components is about equal. This happens – in my 25yr experience – at around .5 to 1m diameter. Here it is possible to obtain, from a correct design, 5 – to maybe 15% of cost per annum. The cost of the new sensible “farm” being about 1/40 that of current “technology”.
Wind is distributed, not centralized. Many (sensible) “TADs” could attatch to existing pylons thereby saving hugely on feed-cabling.
Then there is “Offshore”. But has anyone seen sails re-appearing on ships ? No. The technology seems out of their money-grubbing little reach.