<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind turbines pay back coal use in one month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ewea.org/blog/2012/02/wind-turbines-pay-back-coal-use-in-one-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2012/02/wind-turbines-pay-back-coal-use-in-one-month/</link>
	<description>Breath of fresh air</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoë Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2012/02/wind-turbines-pay-back-coal-use-in-one-month/#comment-12620</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoë Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ewea.org/blog/?p=2885#comment-12620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your comment. We are of course aware of the document you mention, which we also used for our calculations. But there is still a remarkable difference between the two calculations. 
Moreover, the WCA did not specify what product lifetime they considered, no methodology was revealed.
The focus on the manufacturing process aimed at presenting a distorted assessment of the wind turbine product - decommissioning of the turbine, recycling, end of life policies were inexplicably excluded from the assessment
A wind turbine, over a 20-year turbine lifetime, will return over 30 times more energy to society than it consumed during the manufacturing, operation and recycling process]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment. We are of course aware of the document you mention, which we also used for our calculations. But there is still a remarkable difference between the two calculations.<br />
Moreover, the WCA did not specify what product lifetime they considered, no methodology was revealed.<br />
The focus on the manufacturing process aimed at presenting a distorted assessment of the wind turbine product &#8211; decommissioning of the turbine, recycling, end of life policies were inexplicably excluded from the assessment<br />
A wind turbine, over a 20-year turbine lifetime, will return over 30 times more energy to society than it consumed during the manufacturing, operation and recycling process</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: World Coal Association</title>
		<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2012/02/wind-turbines-pay-back-coal-use-in-one-month/#comment-12588</link>
		<dc:creator>World Coal Association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ewea.org/blog/?p=2885#comment-12588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for drawing attention to the World Coal Association infographic. 

The figures WCA cite in the graphic are not ‘way above the reality’ as you suggest – as referenced in the graphic, they are in fact taken from Vestas, a leading manufacturer of wind turbines, in a publicly accessible document.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for drawing attention to the World Coal Association infographic. </p>
<p>The figures WCA cite in the graphic are not ‘way above the reality’ as you suggest – as referenced in the graphic, they are in fact taken from Vestas, a leading manufacturer of wind turbines, in a publicly accessible document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.252 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 15:04:11 -->