<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huge leaps ahead in wind power technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ewea.org/blog/2011/08/huge-leaps-ahead-in-wind-power-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2011/08/huge-leaps-ahead-in-wind-power-technology/</link>
	<description>Breath of fresh air</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: slider</title>
		<link>http://www.ewea.org/blog/2011/08/huge-leaps-ahead-in-wind-power-technology/#comment-11566</link>
		<dc:creator>slider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 04:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ewea.org/blog/?p=1995#comment-11566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conventional wisdom that offshore direct-drive PM drivetrains are the way forward for utility scale wind turbines is misguided.  The rationale for adopting the far-more expensive direct-drive PM configurations with full power conversion, ignores the established historical statistical failure rate data showing that power conversion electronic failures are almost 5 times more common than gearbox failures.

The logical approach, both with regards to LCOE and downtime, would be to improve the gearbox reliability.  Or better yet, develop a mechanical variable speed drivetrain and synchronous AC generator, which would eliminate the failure-prone power conversion electronics altogether.

And since onshore turbines are far less expensive to install than offshore turbines, any approach which reduces the onshore costs is a step in the right direction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conventional wisdom that offshore direct-drive PM drivetrains are the way forward for utility scale wind turbines is misguided.  The rationale for adopting the far-more expensive direct-drive PM configurations with full power conversion, ignores the established historical statistical failure rate data showing that power conversion electronic failures are almost 5 times more common than gearbox failures.</p>
<p>The logical approach, both with regards to LCOE and downtime, would be to improve the gearbox reliability.  Or better yet, develop a mechanical variable speed drivetrain and synchronous AC generator, which would eliminate the failure-prone power conversion electronics altogether.</p>
<p>And since onshore turbines are far less expensive to install than offshore turbines, any approach which reduces the onshore costs is a step in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.330 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 17:34:42 -->