What if the computer you are using right now had been made with wind energy?
By Angelika Pullen, Communications Director, GWEC
A consumer label for wind power called WindMade could soon be coming to the market, to show consumers which companies and products use wind energy. This is an idea that was first announced in January this year, and after many months of hard work and anticipation, new details were made public on Global Wind Day (15 June).
During a media briefing in New York City, the WindMade consortium, which consists of Vestas, GWEC, WWF, Bloomberg, LEGO and the UN Global Compact, presented the first proposed technical standard for the WindMade label for companies. This standard contains the main requirements that a company has to fulfil in order to apply for using the label.
Many companies are actually doing this already – think of IKEA, Walmart and Google, which have all invested in their own wind farms in the past couple of years. These moves received a lot of media attention, because consumers do care where their products come from. Not only do they want to know which ingredients have been used, but they are also increasingly aware of the source of one of the main ingredients in every product: energy.
With the WindMade logo, companies can finally get an independent certificate for using wind power, and communicate this clearly by using a label. Just as with the ‘free trade’ and ‘organic’ labels, consumers will be able to vote with their wallets and support a company with high sustainability standards. They can chose between a world they want, and a world they don’t want.
The company label is a first step for WindMade. It will require companies and organisations to procure at least 25% of their electricity needs from wind power, and the exact share will feature on the label to increase transparency. This can be reached either through direct ownership of wind turbines (such as IKEA, Google and Walmart have done), through long-term power purchase agreements with utilities or wind farm operators, or through pre-approved Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs). What matters in all of these options is that the decision to become WindMade has a direct impact on driving investment in NEW wind power development.
So, what is happening now? The proposed technical standard is currently undergoing 60 days of public consultation, and we strongly encourage all interested parties to provide input. It will then be finalised in the autumn, when the first companies can start applying for membership and go through the certification programme.
Also later this year, the work on the standard for the product label will start, to be finalised a few months after that. So, theoretically, you should be able to find the first products carrying the WindMade label in your local supermarket early next year!
We believe it’s a no brainer: consumers demand sustainability and transparency, companies are already doing it, but could and should do much more, and the wind industry will see a strong impact on demand for wind power. It is a win-win situation, really, and the biggest winner will be our planet.
For more information, a short video, and to comment on the standard, see www.windmade.org or contact Angelika.pullen@gwec.net






It is not a no brainer.
e.g. a fruit and veg grower, owing a big windturbine can show this label now, but in the distant future every Irish producer can as soon as the wind share in the grid exceeds 25%.
The wind share of generated electricity in the Irish grid is now around 12% of demand. A share of 25% has to be reached soon as it is an Irish plan to export electricity to England and the continent.
Has the grower who invested in wind competitive advantage? Hardly.
–
Advantageous to the implementation of wind would be the matching of consumption aka demand to wind generation. Difficult for the grower because he has to supply live stock to his market clients on a daily basis. So lets take IKEA. MDF and Urea glue production and some packaging. We can’t expect them to halt production if there is a windless day and sent their workers home without pay. but the level of adjustment of their production processes to the present wind production level is important and should be expressed in that label.
Regarding the title. At first it seems confronting but in IMHO the wrong product is selected.
One has to look at the whole life-cycle of the computer. 25% of the electric energy for assembly at the manufactures site is neglectable compared to its total electricity use.
Moreover environmental matters of end of live are much more concerning.
Would I pay more for a computer that use less energy for the same performance? Yes I would.
Should I pay more for a computer that has this label. No, but probably I have to.