Enough onshore wind power in Germany to replace nuclear
An incredible 65% of Germany’s electricity needs can be met by onshore wind power alone, according to a new study published by the Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology (IWES) and the German Wind Energy Association (BWE) this week.
The news, which also highlights that this can be achieved with wind power technology currently in use – 3MW wind turbines – has hit headlines far and wide in the German national press.
Hermann Albers, President of the German Wind Energy Association, argues in the Handelsblatt that wind power could create the total amount of electricity needed to phase out nuclear power in Germany.
The story was quickly taken up by Die Welt under the headline “Wind Energy can easily replace nuclear power”. The Ausburger Allgemeine also started up a discussion on this theme.
The Süddeutsche Zeitung carried a story in which the wind energy industry, with its potential to replace nuclear power, said it was Europe’s ‘knight in shining armour’. Meanwhile, other media including national TV and radio reported Albers’ statement that wind energy can replace nuclear power.
The IWES/BWE study finds that if wind power was developed on all suitable land in Germany – around 2% of the surface area – it could generate 390 TWh (terawatt-hour) of electricity per year. Germany’s current electricity demand stands at 600 TWh per year. This shows that wind power’s potential easily outstrips nuclear power’s current electricity generation, which is around 140 TWh per year.
One other notable fact contained in the study is that wind power’s greatest untapped potential in Germany lies in the federal states with the lowest rate of wind power development, namely Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg.






You neglected to mention the caveat that the German Wind Energy Association gave. Conservationists who want to protect mountain tops from large industrial wind and the pumped storage facilities that would be required to firm up the unreliable supply will have to change their attitudes and allow large areas of protected lands to be developed.
Until you have actually stood under a 3 MWe wind turbine mounted on a 130 meter tall tower, it is difficult to understand just how destructive such machines can be when installed in areas that people visit for contemplation, relaxation and enjoyment of nature’s beauty.
No. I have not been under a 3MW turbine, but I know that wind power is the only energy technology that will scale up enough to preserve nature.
Preserving nature is far more important than contemplating it. If we continue using carbon then you will visit a mountaintop for contemplation and enjoyment of nature’s devastation.
We need to make choices. The estimates are that wind/solar energy will cost about 15% more and it will keep some of our favorite trekking ground off limits. In exchange for that we get to keep a world where we can live. What will we choose?
If we keep pushing, we will find out that Mother Nature can become a real bitch.